![]() |
| The Trots, Nazis and Islamists forget their differences - which differences!? - and fuse on the Jews. |
It could be argued, logically, that this fusion of the Far
Left, the Nazis and the Islamists on the subject of the Jews and Israel may
simply display the fact that when some things are true, then all sorts of
people will believe and propagate them; just as Conservatives, Liberals,
socialists, etc. all believe in human rights and just as just about everyone
denies that the world is flat.
I argue otherwise.
I argue that the Far Left, Nazis and Islamists fuse on the
Jews because they fuse on so much else. (Talk to a Nazi ‘anti-Zionist’ about
what he also thinks about blacks, Asians, etc.) Fusing on the Jews is a consequence of their
fusing on much else.
They fuse on their commitment to totalitarianism, illiberalism,
‘lying for justice’, the acceptance of political violence/terrorism on any
scale and for any purpose (in line with their ideologies and aims), in their
black-and-white world-versions and on so much more. But what really unites and
fuses them is their penchant for conspiracy theories. And which social or
ethnic group has become the favourite subject for political conspiracy
theories? That’s right! The Jews!
Conspiratorial thinking is almost the very essence of the
Far Left, the Nazis and the Islamists. Think of the many bogymen of the
conspiritorialists and see if you can recognise if they are the favourites of
the Far Left, the Nazis or the Islamists – or all three! Take this list:
neo-cons, neo-liberals, the Jewish Lobby (or ‘Cabal’), the Israel Lobby, the
Zionist Lobby, the Jewish media (or just the plain Platonic Media), finance
capitalists, bankers, corporatists, capitalists (generally), das System,
Freemasons (sometimes in cahoots with Jews) and so on.
Non-Anti-Semitic Fusions
It’s not just anti-Semitism which unites - and united - the
Far Left, the Nazis and the Islamists. For example, the socialism of National
Socialism united the Nazis with, well, (left-wing) socialists. We have Adolph
Hitler on that. He once wrote:
‘We did not defend Germany against Bolshevism back then
because we were not intending to do anything like conserve a bourgeois world or
go so far as to freshen it up. Had Communism really intended nothing more than
a certain purification by eliminating isolated rotten elements from among the
ranks of our so-called “upper ten thousand”… one could have sat back quietly
and looked on for a while.’
Clearly, the difference highlighted here was deemed to be
between internationalist socialism and Hitler’s own nationalist socialism. But
that doesn’t work either because the Soviet Union, as well as Cuba, China,
Vietnam, etc. were also fiercely nationalist communist regimes.
Even in 1969, fascists were still stressing their socialist
credentials (as they do today, with or without the word ‘socialism’). Leon
Degrelle cried out for
‘the people, worn down with long hours of work, miserably
paid, inadequately protected against accidents at work, illnesses, or old age,
waited full of impatience and anguish to be treated at last with humanity.’
And, in the end, only fascism could save them. Only fascism
has a ‘respect for ordinary people and a desire for social justice’.
It is not surprising, then, by way of an example, that when
communism, and Leftism generally, ‘took to the streets’ in 1960s America (just
like our own ‘anti-Zionists’ today), the fusion of Leftism with Nazism became
all too apparent.
Peter Berger, a Jewish refugee from Austria, peace activist
and sociologist, wrote that
“when ‘observing the [American] radicals in action, I was
repeatedly reminded of the storm troopers that marched through my childhood in
Europe.”

No comments:
Post a Comment